Simon Barnes
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
“The greatest steriliser of inspiration, the greatest deadener of originality, the greatest destroyer of talent.” Proust on snobbery
On May 18, 1922, a dinner party was held at the Majestic, a hôtel de grand luxe on the Avenue Kleber in Paris. The guests included Igor Stravinsky, Serge Diaghilev, Pablo Picasso, Marcel Proust and James Joyce. It is a safe assumption, then, that the party was not organised by Rio Ferdinand. There was no Barry White music.
Joyce was drunk and out of his depth socially; Proust, turning up late, charmed everybody except Stravinsky, whom he expected to share his worshipful admiration for Beethoven’s late quartets. “ Pire que les autres,” Stravinksy snarled (Worse than the others). Reasonable to surmise that no such conversation took place at the Manchester United Christmas party at a hôtel de grand luxe in Manchester.
Mind you, the United do was exclusive in its way. It’s not everyone who can afford a £4,000-per-head bash. Well, it’s not so extravagant really, is it? Not if you are getting 15 and 20 times as much every week. That sort of money gives you a taste for champagne at £500 a bottle.
Yes, I know what you’re thinking: would they actually notice if the hotel swapped the bottles of Cristal vintage for a few cases of cava from the Co-op? Oi, you! Pint of Cristal ’53 with a lemonade top! And a packet of diamond-encrusted salt and vinegar crisps an’ all!
Oh, how we resent the fortunes made by footballers. There are few subjects more certain to cause waves of righteous indignation the length and breadth of the land than the salaries of leading footballers. Use the word obscene, mention the nurses, and off we go: overpaid louts without taste or any sense of real values, insulated from the real world, think they’re God Almighty and they can’t even win us the World Cup.
It seems absurdly inappropriate, does it not, that these men, horribly young and seldom from anything even approaching a middle-class background, should have all that money. You or I would make much better use of it, buying first editions of Ulysses, hiring a band to play the late quartets at a truly exquisite party and really, truly appreciating the Cristal. Even if our tastes are less highfalutin, we would surely carry off vast wealth more stylishly than your average millionaire footballer.
Whenever we make judgments about people for the crime of having more money than us, envy is never far away. And whenever an English person criticises anyone for the way he spends his fortune, be sure that the envy is mixed with snobbery.
Which of us did not look at the pictures from the Beckhams’ wedding and, like Eliot’s eternal Footman, “snicker”? We had a right to: it was hilarious and quite mind-bogglingly vulgar. It made us all feel (a) superior and (b) poor. But David Beckham did look such a prat sitting on his throne in his white suit, it would have been a crime to withhold a snicker.
We don’t resent other classes of rich people quite as much as we resent rich footballers. We wag our head in bewilderment at teenage internet millionaires. We respect the force of the rich buggers on Dragons’ Den and comprehend that it was not money that made them forceful but vice versa. We accept that pop musicians get money for catching the present fashion in noise.
But it’s a different matter with footballers. We hate their wealth because it is a comparatively recent phenomenon, as any former footballer in his late forties will tell you at length. The maximum wage was abolished only in 1961. We hate their wealth because they are so young. We hate it because they get the money for playing a game, which is supposed to be fun, which many people pay subs in order to play.
But above all, we hate it because footballers are working-class. The do in Manchester was a working lads’ night out: a piss-up, a knees-up, transmogrified by the magical power of money, so that Cristal replaced lager, a hôtel de grand luxe replaced the pub, hand-picked girls replaced the local slappers and security men kept the door. But it was still nothing more nor less than a lads’ piss-up.
And this offends us. The money hasn’t changed the working-class blokes into something else, it has just made them rich. This destroys our sense of what is fitting in life, it attacks some ancient, atavistic feeling that good taste is something to do with good breeding, and that both are something to do with money.
The incongruity of possessing both considerable wealth and the tastes of the poor throws our class-conscious English souls into perplexity. English literature is full of people who have money and, sometimes, achievement, but who can’t throw off their essential vulgarity. You find them in Jane Austen and James Bond, in Kingsley Amis and Charles Dickens, and, for that matter, in Proust. Sir Hugo Drax and Madame Verdurin are brother and sister.
We have to find a reason for resenting the amounts of money that footballers get paid, or we would have to come to terms with our own snobbery and envy. So we like to come to the conclusion that these “pampered” and “cosseted” and “precious” people are lesser footballers because of their wealth; that they are prepared to settle for less because footballers are no longer “hungry”.
That may be true of mediocrities. It is not true of genuinely good players; not true of genuinely good athletes in any discipline, starting with Michael Jordan. Ferdinand may have a magnetic attraction for sleaze, but no one who saw him play for United last weekend would call him smug or sated or complacent as a footballer. He had a towering match.
Beckham was a millionaire many times over even when he played that famous match for England against Greece. He didn’t give up when things got difficult; he didn’t tell himself that it didn’t really matter, he had enough money anyway.
Footballers get paid vast sums of money because that’s the going rate. You can hardly expect them to haggle to get paid less. Football is a rich sport (at least for those on the top), and so footballers themselves are rich. Deal with it.
Money itself is not evil. It is people who are evil, not the stuff they put in their pockets. All the same, money does affect people: it can make you feel so special that normal rules don’t apply to you. The temptation to treat other people indifferently or badly is always there and you can find it in rich people of exquisite taste and impeccable family trees, as well as in footballers.
Perhaps there was a rape at the United do, and perhaps this kind of financially fuelled arrogance has something to do with it. We don’t know yet. But if rape is wrong, wealth is not wrong. It is merely enviable.

Simon Barnes is the multi-award-winning chief sportswriter at The Times. He also writes a Saturday column on wildlife. His 15 books include three novels and the best-selling How To Be A Bad Birdwatcher. His latest, The Meaning of Sport, was published last autumn. He lives in Suffolk with his family and five horses
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip

Find tickets for:
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
What I resent is that these jammy bleeders are getting paid vast sums for doing something that they are good at; I couldn't care less where they are from on the class spectrum.
I have a wealth of personal talents, including tree climbing, remembering song lyrics and the ability to conjure up a watertight excuse at a second's notice; sadly, none of these has a multi million pound market in the real world. Football, on the other hand, does.
If only I'd spent less time up a tree as a kid.....
Brendan, Martin, S;ovakia
Lots of good points made in this article and also in the comments, but remember this: Most of these party-hearty players don't have a lot going for them besides sporting ability. No real intellect to speak of, no perceived trade or professional abilities outside of football, and certainly nothing special in the looks department (not a David Beckham or a Roque Santa Cruz among them, I'm afraid). So they have to rely on their status as football heroes to impress women. And guess what? It works everytime. That's why they do it. What can you do? It is what it is.
Pat, New Jersey,
Surely the real problem here isn't class but the fact that these people are just plain stupid. So what if they can kick a ball around, I've seen a chimpanzee on a skateboard.
BJD, London,
I would quite agree with Ginny, and i'm a bloke. How sad to see women actually seeking to be treated as "trophies" or "objects". Yet another sad indication of society going down the tubes really very quickly.
Peter Koeb (aka Old Fogy), Geneva, Switzerland
I resent them getting paid so much because it means I can't even think of paying to watch a match, not even in League 2.
CG, Liverpool, UK
Nobody likes people flashing their cash and thinking they own the world. Be they working class or middle class or even upper class. The reason why footballers get it in the neck more than other high earners is quite simple.........it sells newspapers. Too many people like to hear negative stories about these players.
And considering the circulation of the tabloids has gone through the roof this week as a result of the man utd story, says it all. Even when players earnt less money during the 1970's and 1980's they were always getting stick for their off the field behaviour. And it was the same reason, it sells newspapers. If people stopped buying the tabloids when they print stories like this, then they will stop printing them.
Its a simple case of giving the people what they want.
Victor, London,
Rob,
I would hope that men in general, or those who have had the advantage of being educated appropriately or taught the lesson of values, do not have this view of women. If they do then that surely depicts a very pessimistic view of males throughout the world.
Sure, there is enough evidence to suggest that sexism exists in certain corners of the world and throughout history, but where people are more highly educated and tolerance is promoted, that this view is less prevalent and disliked as it should be.
To say sexism and exploitation is a general attitude towards women is wrong, and if it is, it shouldn't be. It would be like saying Racism is a general attitude people have. Is that acceptable too?
I'm not a raving feminist, but I do get annoyed when I see people being exploited in anyway, men, women, children, animals - whoever. And yes, the women are very stupid to want to fill those roles I outlined, but maybe lessons in self respect and values would benefit them too!
Ginny, London, UK
Mr Barnes. I am probably the arch-typical sort of guy who might be expected to hold the views about Footballer's salaries which you write about. Ex-Service, old - and very old-fashioned. But I disagree 100% with the line you were running. I am not in the least envious of their salaries and I never but never 'attack' them; and this is because I don't have to pay for them as I have no interest whatever in football.
But when it comes to those ex-Chief Constables who take advantage of some loophole to retire early, collect a vast pension and then at once become Chief Constable of the neighbouring county, I GO WILD - BECAUSE I AM PAYING FOR IT.
Conrad Jenkin, Petersfield, Hampshire
I have a rather old-fashioned view towards footballers' wages. I do not in the least envy or begrudge the recipients their inflated salaries any more than I would any successful entrepreneur or salesman. The labourer is worthy of his hire. My resentment is based not on class, behaviour or snobbish intellectual prejudice but is entirely based on the wrongheaded principle of rewarding mediocrity and failure. This is not restricted to football. Some of England's flashier cricketers have much to answer for.
Steven Spencer, Virginia Water, Surrey
Another party defined by drunk behaviour ends in tears. This is not just the debauched realm of our top flight footballers, but is the kind of event that happens week in, week out, in this country. On the whole I would think that the premiership footballers behave better than other people in their age group. Please, please do not let a Texan have any say in how our country should be run!
john, london,
no, it's not because they are working class it's because, and i'm stunned to say this of simon barnes, idiots persist in clinging to the belief that footballe is a working class game- it's not, and a good chunk of the english side don't have working class backgrounds, beckham being one. and it's becasue diots cling to this belief that footballers, the premier league etc can rip you off so easily because they know u don't want to face the truth and will carry on paying stupid sums to watch them and wear the kits as it's the peoples game, unlike those ppsh toff rugby players as football fans are want to say. the players do all they can to keep the public at arms length and have nothing in common with the average fan, working class indeed.
Justin Stone, leicester,
I'm afraid all this criticism is generated by envy and whipped-up by our atrocious trouble-making media. After all, the players do not write their pay-cheques, the clubs do that, so blame them for the high amounts they are willing to offer. And why do the media always report the players wages in pounds/week rather than pounds/year, which is the method applied to most every other walk of life? I would guess because it sounds more to the average person and is thus more likely to engender envy. And all you people criticising out there, how many of you would say no if your boss offered to pay you ten times what you are making now? Exactly!
Al, Weybridge, UQ
It's a relevant article. You have to be soo uber-ultra-competative to even get to a mediocre position in football. People take that forgranted. A run of bad injuries (or even one bad tackle) and you're finished.
Alot of the time it IS a bad case of the 'green eyed monster' from the general public, towards these elite footballers (and hte lifestyle it entails).
As for the England set up, the wheels started to come off for McClaren and England as the result of outrageously intense media (vampirism) pressure. Following a freak (10,000/1) blooper away to Croatia.
IMO, awesome slant on your arguments. Another great piece.
Keep up the good work Simon.
(The class argument is no different from sports such as boxing, for example). With the exception of LeSaux, u dont get very many intellectuals in these types of contact sports.
Glen Oglethorpe, Workington, Cumbria, UK
An Irish friend remarked to me how England fans appear to hate their players as much as love them. What's that about if it's not resentment and envy, the English default states?
Sharker, London,
Whitey, Surrey
If you actually believe what you've written, you need to get out more mate!
If you were being ironic, I apologise...
Homer, London,
Very disappointed with this article - I normally enjoy your pieces. However, I am suspicious of your true motives for what you have written. I believe there is an ulterior motive in this which seems to be reoccurring in certain other newspapers. Footballers are not exempt from criticism or the law irrespective of class or wealth and should be treated accordingly
John, Bexhill on Sea, UK
Two weeks ago I watched a German Bundesliga game in Bochum â it was a Saturday afternoon and great value for the â¬12.50 ticket. That evening, by complete coincidence, we ran into the team at their Christmas party at a chic restaurant in town. The players (just as working class as those at Man U), were smartly dressed and accompanied by a bevy of elegant beauties. They were listening intently to their club president making a speech, congratulating them on their successful season to date. When they saw us looking at them through a window, some of them waved at us and smiled. Our hosts told us that it was not unusual to run into individual players in town, and that it was written into their contracts that they had to stop to talk to fans and sign autographs. Perhaps Sir Alex should get himself over there to take a look at how a club should be run, and instead of banning the playersâ party next year, actually attend to ensure that some basic standards of behaviour are adhered to.
Eduardo, London, UK
Some of these state I am not envious but then go onto display exactly that. I couldn't agree more with this article as have said for a long time that envy and class are key reasons fuelling the unfair critisism. Footballers provide a fantastic service. I pay to watch them like millions of others and will continue to do so until the service declines. These young men have worked incredibly hard to get to this position and display self belief and bravery to go out and perform each week in front of millions of armchair critics. It takes a special mentality to do that not unlike the determination a succesful businessman displays.
Whitey, Surrey,
Ginny, I am aware this is a classic response, but no-one made these women act in this way, and no-one else 'cast' them in the role of 'WAG' or 'recruited hangers on' they did it themselves.
Maybe footballers would have more respect for these women (not all, just these women), if they had a little more respect for themselves.
I do agree with your point about being better role models though, not sure if footballers attitude towards women adds to or is a result of general male attitudes towards women, but being better role models wouldn't hurt.
Rob, Bristol,
The saddest thing in all of this is the fact that the money handed out to these so-called athletes will eventually end up as the mitigating factor in the games demise! We've already seen several clubs go into administration and I'm sure that there are several more on the brink. I can see where eventually there will be very few clubs that can survive under the present financial set-up and who wants to watch the same dozen or so clubs play each other four or even five times every season!
Michael Tyler, Stokes Bay, Canada
It's not that the footballers are predominantly working class that is the issue. Anyone flouting their money or wasting it in such a grotesque way is unattractive, whatever "class" they are.
Many of those who are fortunate to have alot of money and value the priveleges it gives seek to use it to make the world a better place. This is something I think the footballers should try to emulate.
Mike, Surrey, UK
It was ever thus; top sportsmen have always been richly rewarded and always will be. The problem with the small group of footballers that always appear in these grotty red-top scandals is that they seem to live like some kind of roman emperor would; thinking that their wealth and fame give them a license to act how they please. As a non football fan, I think what grates as much as anything else is that the england players especially are faboulously rewarded for mediocre performances at the highest level but are constantly feted as the best in the world, whilst the clubs squeeze every last penny out of the fans. Football as a whole encapsulates all that is wrong with this country - brash, mediocre, overblown, non-inclusive and living beyond it's means. It has absolutely nothing to do with class jelousy rather the knowledge that these people have absolutely no concept of what a fantastic opportunity has been presented to them.
Scott , London,
i would say that we resent paying the players wages, by buying tickets to watch them, buying the t-shirt, the video game etc etc, and then seeing it spat back in your face. Holding a Party is fine, and of course people who earn what they earn are going to go overboard. but the general lack of respect shown towards the club, the fans, the opposite sex etc. its all very hard to stomach.
man utd arent the only ones gulty of this, and it shows how out of touch and uncaring our "heroes" are.
very upsetting
red-faced-red, Newport, S.Wales
What annoys me most about footballers is not the money, but the lack of respect they have for the opposite sex. Wherever women are involved in the lives of these footballers they are either cast in the role of grasping WAG or selectively recruited hangers on. Why the great and the good in the game do not do anything to educate these young men on how to be gentleman escapes me.
Presumably these men have mothers, sisters, daughters. What a great example they set.
Ginny, London, UK
Simon your headline is wrong.The majority of fans do not resent the money footballers earn,but they do resent the behavoir of some footballers .They do resent the arrogant,crass, insensative and downright loutish antics that have been demonstrated by some footballers this week.
Maybe it's an 'English' thing,because the picture we saw of Man United players on their 'boys night out' was of all English players.If this was done for team bonding,then the players are
more stupid than we think they are.
chris dee, london,
Simon, who are you to judge the rest of us? Anyway, I think you're missing the point.
What the majority dislike is having our noses rubbed in it as to how rich they are - Ferdinand was reputed to have been boasting about how much the party cost, not how good it was, how enjoyable the food and the surroundings, but HOW MUCH IT COST - that's what mattered. And who could forget poor little Cashley Cole almost crashing his car when his agent told him Arsenal would only give him £50k, not £55k?
Jon, Auckland - braying asses from the City are despised just as much as the footballers when they are larging it up in West End bars going on about their huge bonuses they just don't get the same publicity.
People aren't generally envious, but no one likes their smug "I couldn't help noticing, but I appear to be considerably richer than you" attitude
Homer, London,
Couldn't agree more.
There are more City bankers who earn more than our top footballers but they don't get anywhere near the level of slating that the footballers get because their talents are in their heads rather than their feet. Pure envy!!
Jon, Auckland, New Zealand
Britain needs to define consent to within a reasonable distance of a girl being able to walk as opposed to carried.
Tazia, Dallas, USA
Agree. If I was being offered large sums of cash to do my job, I wouldn't turn it down!! Maybe we should be looking at the way cash in such a rich sport is distributed and, more importantly, by whom. Sadly i think the BskyB horse has already bolted and nothing is likely to change. Set up a salary cap, a league will pop up with no cap-no doubt funded by TV.
Its a dilly of a pickle!
Rob, Hobart, Australia
I fail to see how our society would be better off if no-one ever criticised bad taste.
Oliver Chettle, Bedford,