James Hider in Baghdad
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
Iraq opened its main oilfields to exploitation by international companies yesterday in a first step towards reintegrating its massive reserves into a market hitting staggering prices.
Hussain al-Shahristani, the Oil Minister, said that he was keen to use international finance and expertise to allow Iraq to realise its full oil potential, an important step to boosting reconstruction and ultimately ending the violence. He said that the Government had drawn up a list of 35 companies and six state-owned oil firms that would be allowed to bid for long-term contracts in six oilfields.
But the long-awaited news was soured by the revelation that five big Western oil companies had refused to sign smaller, short-term service contracts to renovate the country’s dilapidated oil infrastructure unless they were guaranteed a slice of the massive oil-pumping deal.
Iraq has some of the world’s largest proven oil reserves, behind only Saudi Arabia and Iran. Some Iraqi leaders claim that the real figure could be almost three times higher.
Mr al-Shahristani said: “The six oilfields that have been announced today are the backbone of Iraq’s oil production, and some of them are getting old and production is declining.” He said he hoped that the contracts would be signed within a year.
In a sign of the high stakes involved, however, Mr al-Shahristani said that six smaller deals also expected to be signed with Western oil giants yesterday had stalled at the last minute because the companies were demanding a share of the oil production in return for revamping the country’s infrastructure, rather than a flat rate.
The deals, worth $500,000 (£250,000) each and expected to last about two years, were meant to lift Iraq’s oil production rapidly by 500,000 barrels a day. The agreements were to have been signed with Shell, BP, Exxon Mobil, Chevron and Total.
Mr al-Shahristani said: “We did not finalise any agreement with them because they refused to offer consultancy based on fees as they wanted a share of the oil.”
Analysts had said that the five companies, four of which operated the Iraq Petroleum Company before it was nationalised by Saddam Hussein’s Baath Party almost four decades ago, were hoping to sign the relatively small deals in the hope of winning favour from the oil ministry for the bigger contracts.
But Mr al-Shahristani, a Shia nuclear scientist who was sent to one of Saddam’s worst jails for refusing to build nuclear weapons in the 1980s, said that there would be no favours granted in the main bids for one of the most lucrative oilfields in the world.
With suspicions still swirling that the 2003 invasion was started to gain access to Iraq’s oilfields, the ministry wanted to impose strict conditions on the contracts, which it hoped would raise production by 1.5 million barrels a day from the current 2.5 million.
Foreign companies would have to take on a local partner, with a minimum 25 per cent stake. They would also have to open a branch in Baghdad, which they have been loath to do because of the security situation.
Iraq has been slow to exploit its hydrocarbon potential, which US war planners had hoped would finance the country’s post-conflict reconstruction. Insurgents have frequently attacked vulnerable pipelines.
Analysts have given warning that billions of dollars would be needed to boost capacity to a level where it could have an impact on record global oil prices of more than $140 a barrel.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
"Iraq" isn't opening its oil fields up. It's the rogue US empire which is opening up Iraq's oil fields for super-exploitation by the oil majors.
US occupation is the only reason why the contracts in Iraq are so unfair compared to what other oil producing countries can insist on.
Richard Cheeseman, Wellington, New Zealand
And when the next dictator takes over, he'll nationalize the oilfields again.
Doesn't anyone learn the lessons of history?
leila , manchester, uk
The quoted figure of 500,000 pounds ($1 million ) per contract is obviously wrong. It is absurd. Allowing for travel,subsistence, insurance, overhead it would provide for four experts for one year.
Bill Smith , McLean , VA
Stop conspiracy everywhere.This deal was made for a simple reason. The foreign companies have the expertise in this area. Iraq will benefit the most given the price of oil now.With the cash Iraq stands to make, Yaseen, they can develop their own education and health infrastructure
Eric, NC, USA
It is a shame that the Bush Administration, with McCain's consent, wasted America's money and blood pursuing Baghdad Oil, and now will fail in that endeavor, too.
"Will McBush use our troops and our12 billion per month to protect the foreign oil companies who will get the oil contracts?
Jim, Kosciusko, usa
It means only US,British and Canadian companies will be getting the contracts
Huseyin Kavrak, Shanghai, China
Good idea Deborah, an even better one is to skip the suggestion phase and just get out!
Gwenda Blackwell, Melbourne, Australia
What did I say from the very 9/11??? It is all because of OIL. I hate it when I'm right
Renata, London, UK
Before we criticize Big Oil for rejecting the short-term contracts, let's examine their scale. Engineering firms usually contract a single employee at at least $1,000 a day when onsite. These short-term contracts are only worth $500,000. The numbers don't indicate any sort of profit for services,
Chris, VA, USA
thank you Haile. a voice of reason.
gwe, torrington, usa
No matter why this war was started, the result is this: A free, prosperous, stable, democratic Iraq. No matter how you feel about this war, no one has gained more from it than the Iraqi people. Now with oil prices at $145 per barrel and rising, Iraq's wealth will sky-rocket! YOU CAN THANK US LATER!!
Haile, Cleveland, USA
Why is no other service being bidded for by the rest of the world. Will the US bid to develop Iraq's education or health services. I think not, the greedy neo con hawks want to bathe in the oil - let them!! They can live happily ever after. For them God has the worst part of hell reserved!!!
Yaseen, London, UK
Wait and see! The real reason for this war is coming up now...OIL! At the front of the line are the big western oil companies trying to tell a foreign country of what is best for them. Throw them out. Lets watch poor George cry the blues.
tom, upper beeding, uk
iraq's oil and other assets have been on auction since the invasion by the usa.
will there be anything left for iraqis by the time they leave ? that is if they leave.
ebbi 581, valencia , spain
So the American government got what it went in for!
Ken, London,
The big five oil companies refused to sign the short term deals so that the inside traders and the speculators can continue to make money on the futures market. Signing a short term deal would drop prices, and God knows, that would only benefit the victims, not the oil rapists themselves.
M.L. Bushman, Sun River, MT, USA
As long as the US is in Iraq trying to stop the violence, the Federal govt. should make strong suggestions...either sell the oil without opening a branch in Baghdad..or we're out of here.
Deborah Oda, Auburn, WA, US