Christina Lamb in Kabul
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
British officials covered up evidence that a Taliban commander killed by special forces in Helmand last year was in fact a Pakistani military officer, according to highly placed Afghan officials.
The commander, targeted in a compound in the Sangin valley, was one of six killed in the past year by SAS and SBS forces. When the British soldiers entered the compound they discovered a Pakistani military ID on the body.
It was the first physical evidence of covert Pakistani military operations against British forces in Afghanistan even though Islamabad insists it is a close ally in the war against terror.
Britain’s refusal to make the incident public led to a row with the Afghan president Hamid Karzai, who has long accused London of viewing Afghanistan through the eyes of Pakistani military intelligence, which is widely believed to have been helping the Taliban.
“He feels he has been telling everyone about Pakistan for the past six years and here was the evidence, yet London refused to release it, because they care more about their relations with Islamabad than Kabul,” said a source close to the president. “He knows Britain is worried about inflaming its large Pakistani population, but that is no excuse.”
So furious was Karzai that he threatened to expel British diplomats. When some months later he was informed by the governor of Helmand that British officials were secretly negotiating with the Taliban, he expelled two men and accused Britain of wanting to set up a training camp for former Taliban fighters.
Karzai will visit London next month for talks with Gordon Brown in an attempt to repair the strained relations between the two countries.
“He is very sad about the breakdown of relations with Britain,” said the source. “He loves British culture and poetry, had a British education [at a school in India], likes tea in the afternoon and thinks Gordon Brown is a very decent man, not a cheat.”
British officials in Kabul refused to comment on the allegation that they had covered up the discovery of a Pakistani soldier. They insisted Karzai’s government had been informed of the negotiations with the Taliban, adding that “the camp was just a place for them to be reintegrated, learn about hygiene and things”.
During the war against the Soviet Union in the 1980s, officers from Pakistani military intelligence regularly accompanied Afghan mujaheddin inside Afghanistan and directed operations.
The Afghan claims of Pakistani involvement in Helmand were backed by a senior United Nations official who said he had been told by his superiors to keep quiet after Pakistan’s ambassador to the UN apparently threatened to stop contributing forces to peacekeeping missions. Pakistan is the UN’s biggest supplier of peacekeeping troops.
The coalition’s refusal to confront Pakistan changed after the bombing of the Indian embassy in Kabul last July, when 41 people were killed. According to both British and US intelligence, phone intercepts led directly back to an Afghan cell of Pakistan’s military intelligence.
The past month has seen US forces carry out bombings and a ground raid on Pakistani territory. Claims of Pakistan’s involvement were rejected by Asif Durrani, the country’s chargé d’affaires in Kabul. “Afghanistan wants to blame someone else for its problems and Pakistan is just the whipping boy,” he said.
However, repeated accusations from Karzai about Pakistan’s active support for the Taliban have been backed by a senior US marine officer.
Lieutenant-Colonel Chris Nash, who commanded an embedded training team in eastern Afghanistan from June 2007 to March this year, told the Army Times that Pakistani forces flew repeated helicopter missions into Afghanistan to resupply a Taliban base camp during a fierce battle in June last year. Nash said: “We were on the receiving end of Pakistani military D-30 [a howitzer]. On numerous occasions Afghan border police checkpoints and observation posts were attacked by Pakistani military forces.”
Comments by Brigadier Mark Carleton-Smith in The Sunday Times last week that a decisive military victory against the Taliban was not possible and negotiations should be opened have received widespread backing.
General Jean-Louis Georgelin, France’s military chief, said: “There is no military solution to the Afghan crisis and I totally share this feeling.”
Robert Gates, the US defence secretary, who initially dismissed the brigadier’s comments as “defeatist”, said on Friday that the US was now prepared to back talks with the Taliban.
The deadly toll
— 120 British soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan since 2002
— At least 4,200 Afghans, including 1,450 civilians, have died this year alone
— Total cost of British operations in the Afghan war from 2001 to 2008 has been £3.2 billion
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
A recent article by Foreign Affiars admits that India has numerous counselates in afghanistan and RAW is upto no good. While ISI is maligned, no one brings up raw sewage of RAW ? Raw presence and operation into Pak from afghan bases is unprecedented escalation of Indian hostilities against Pak !
Ahmad , Orlando , USA
One cant blame the Brits to have soft corner for Pakistan. Didnt they act as midwife when the Islamic baby was delivered in 1947 out of erstwhile colonial India's womb.
NK Pant, Dehradun, India
Again a biased coverage by western media. Afghan, Indian and British side of story has been told, but there is ne mention of 3,000 plus troops that Pakistan has lost and no mention on civilian casualties. By the way no mention of Indian and Afghan espinage operations in Balochistan.
Shehram Khan, Toronto, Canada
Unless Pakistan Army does not control its imperialistic tendencies, there is little hope for peace in the region. It is largely responsible for destroying Pakistan's political culture and civil society fabric and its out to do same in Afghanistan.
Rishi, New Delhi/Newark, India/USA
this Pakistani officer must be very stupid to have army id with him on covert operation (if it was) or some one care to explain further? .
Sanwal, Brooklyn,
This may be true. A short history. During 1999 war with India in Kargil, Pakistan first said that Kashmiri militants are fighting against India. Later India produced the Pakistani ID cards worn by the dead combatants. Then at the end Pakistan accepted that they were Pakistani soldiers.
Shaan, Chennai, india
I have a feeling that this story was reported by The Independent some six months ago. In any case, the current story does have a lot more additional detail.
manoj, New Delhi,
The pertinent question is that how did Karzai know? And, why did he keep quite? Why he had to rely on the British to announce it? Its his country and if facts stated are true then he should have made them public!
Adil Saleem Khan, gujranwala, Pakistan
hogwash..the british failed to make a fuss about it cuz they had the commonsense to realize that the military intelligence isn't stupid. Even if they were running an agent in afghanistan do you honestly believe that they would let him take his military ID with him? ever heard of deniability?
syed, New York,
Never mind if he carried military identity or not. Was it his body?If so, what was he doing in a Taliban base?.If not, can Pakistan produce the officer?.If he cannot be produced, then has Pakistan got an explanation of where this officer is?
Alan Henderson, Whitley Bay, England
This is ridiculous. It has been since past couple of months since we are hearing such news, allegations but no one has ever been able to prove anything with evidence, ever. Afghans are already hell bent over maligning their neighbor and its sovereignity and are not losing any opportunity to do so.
Shiraz Mehmud, Karlskrona,
Pakistan Complains of presence of thousands of Indian inteligence officers in afghanistan specificaly in areas bordering Pakistan. we also resent lack of action against supplies of weopens to terrorists in Pakistan by Indian inteligence on behalf of afghan government...britain is a sensible country.
Sharjeel Ali, Leeds, UK
During the 1999 Kargil war between India and Pakistan, the 'mujahideen' killed by Indian troops were found to be carrying Pakistani military ID cards. They were in fact Northern light Infantry and SSG in mufti. These are not "secret agents". They are simply Pakistani soldiers in civilian clothes.
john smith, kingston,
Karzai and many other Afghan officials has be come an extremely rich man. odd that or very very iffy
peter c, Devizes, Wessex
British PoWs in Helmand are mostly Pakistani military. The US has been putting strong pressure on the British to keep this under wraps, for about a year now.
Conrad Sawyers, Loughboro', England
For God sake don't make fool of people. Do you think we believe that an agent would carry his identity.
Shahid Mirza, Jauharabad., Pakistan
Pakistan's involvement was well known!
"they care more about their relations with Islamabad than Kabul"
This is clearly evident. Why Britain is there in first place!
"Gordon Brown is a very decent man, not a cheat."
British will be able to answer this better than anyone else!
R K Mani , Mumbai, India
Mr. Taylor's comment regarding agents not carrying ID that would connect them to their government/agency is correct. Many OPS personnel still feel that carrying some form of ID is a lifeline to what they are fighting for. If captured the fact that they do not have ID is of no consequence. Most talk.
Mike Paul, ISAF, Afghanistan
All secret agents are trained not to carry any ID or any item that can link them to their country. Am I to believe that a Pakistani Army officer, no less, was carrying his military ID card on his body whilst leading Taliban against NATO in Afghanistan ? Give me a break...dont insult my intelligence
John Taylor, London,
The feud between Afghanistan and Pakistan goes back to 1947. The then Afghan government tried its best to create unrest in Pakistan by supporting so-called Pakthoonistan which was also supported by India. The Taleban are Afghans and no doubt are supported by Pakistan, as N.A was supported by India.
Akram Malik, Gympie, Australia/Queensland