Get 20% off your bill at Pizza Express

US forces have abandoned a small base in eastern Afghanistan that was the scene of an intense assault by Taleban fighters in which 9 US soldiers died. The base was quickly occupied by Taleban fighters after the departure of the US forces, according to local government officials.
Nato spokesmen confirmed that US forces pulled out of the base in Wanat village of Nuristan yesterday afternoon.
"We are confirming we have vacated our combat outpost at Wanat," Nato spokesman Mark Laity told The Times. "All these kinds of outposts are temporary. We will continue to maintain a strong presence in the area. We will continue to perform regular patrols in the area."
The base was occupied by 45 US soldiers from the 101st Airborne Division and 25 Afghan soldiers. It was only two days old when it came under fierce bombardment on Sunday morning. Taleban fighters successfully breached the outer defences and were prevented from overrunning the base only after fierce hand-to-hand fighting.
Just over half of the US garrison was killed or injured in the battle, with 9 US dead and 15 injured; a further 4 Afghan troops were also injured.
Afghan officials reported that the area was occupied by Taleban fighters after the US withdrawal. Privately, Western military sources told The Times that the Wanat Combat Outpost was poorly sited and overlooked on three sides by buildings in the village, which Taleban fighters from a force estimated to be around 200 strong were able to use as firing points.
"When ISAF withdrew yesterday, we couldn't stand against the Taleban," said Omar Sami Taza, secretary for the Nuristan governor. "We pulled back and the district fell into the Taleban's hand. We will send more troops from the centre to recapture it."
Another official in Nuristan, Doctor Farooq Nuristani, provincial head of the Serious Crime Department of the police told The Times that American forces arrested the local district governor and police chief and disarmed the police on suspicion that they had provided support to the Taleban.
"There is great tension between the police and the Americans. We have sent a force of 60 more police to the area to provide security."
Such is the inaccessibility of Nuristan that information from the affected area is scarce.
Afghan newspapers meanwhile have reacted with fury to a succession of recent collateral damage incidents that are alleged to have strengthened support for the Taleban among local people in the area around the US base at Wanat.
Among several apparent errors involving US aircraft in recent weeks was an attack in the same valley as the Wanat base. Up to 17 civilians were reported killed in the incident on July 4, including three medical staff for International Medical Corps, an NGO.
"Such acts provoke public hatred towards internal and foreign forces and force people to join the enemy who encourages them to carry out terrorist and suicide attacks," said the state-run Hewad newspaper earlier this month.
"Such arbitrary bombing raids and brutal killings have been repeated so many times during the past nearly seven years that now it is difficult to believe these foreign forces have come to our country for assistance," the pro-government Weesa daily said.
US commanders have admitted that a 40 per cent increase in Taleban attacks along the eastern border, a spike in activity that coincided with the start of negotiations between the Pakistan government and militants in the tribal areas of Pakistan in April, has largely been met with an increase in air strikes.
There has been a 40 per cent increase in the number of aerial munitions used by US aircraft in the first six months of the year, compared to the same period last year, with 646 dropped in June alone.
This week the Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Michael Mullen, said that three more US Brigades (around 10,000 troops) were required for deployment to Afghanistan to bolster US forces against the resurgent Taleban.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£100k
The National Skills Academy for Social Care
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
£75k - £85k
Confidential
London
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
$3.5 million
Also avaliable for rent
Times Online Property Search will help you find it
Amazing Far East Offers - Visit Hong Kong
from £499pp
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Dear Tony, (Seattle, USA) I fear the American's have learnt little from your experience in Vietnam where US forces won every tactical battle but still lost strategically. It is not winning the fight that counts, but who wins the war.
Robert Grant, Bham, United Kingdom
It was not a FOB. It was, as stated by the 173rd's own commander, merely a temporary bivouac postion.The U.S./Aghan troops took 24 casualties while inflicting approx 80 on the enemy. Outnumbered 3 to 1 we inflicted 3 to 1 casualties on the enemy. To the liberal media: who do you think won the fight?
Tony, Seattle, USA
Get your facts straight!! It was Chosen Company, 2/503rd of the 173rd Airborne. It is a great disservice to those heroic men for you to make such a mistake. It also draws into question the rest of your article if you cannot get the most important fact right.
Peggy, Louisiana, USA
One battle has never defined a war, a geography, an army, an "armed movement," or any foreign policy. Declaring defeat too soon, or victory too early declares ones political motives. It does not describe history. A little objectivity, please!
Forrest Dunlap, Atlanta, GA -mUSA
Those boy's in the one 0 one did alright for themselves sounds like a miserable place for a FOB if the guy that picked it still alive he's going to have to live with that decision for the rest of his life. But with the Rules of Engagement the way are they might have been placed there, for PC reasons
Ken , nyc,
Logistics provided from safe havens in Pakistan are the root cause of the problems. Unless they are attacked mercilessly, Taliban cannot be contained.
It is time to cut and run in Iraq and focus in Afghanistan.
Krishna R. Kumar, Udupi, India
For Timur, the 101st Airborne Division is not special forces, but regular infantry (airmobile). And they did pretty well, considering they ejected the attackers despite over 50% casualties before air support arrived.
Charlie Martel, Orleans, France
Who picked the site for the base. If it was surrounded by buildings on 3 sides, and the Talibs are known to be strong in the area, what were they thinking. Someone must be held accountable.
James Shay, Austin, USA
It sounds like the tactical officer in charge made a huge mistake by siting the "base" in a vulnerable position (buildings on three sides). What happened to training in fortified position fieldcraft? What happened to training in 'lay of the land' observation?
William, Los Angeles, USA
Have no fear. Obama will soon be here. Democratic military forces are much stronger than Republican forces.
Jim, Albuquerque, USA
is that all the US "special forces2 can do, make contact and then call for air support?
Timur, London,
Afghanistan's terrain defeated the Brits in the C19th, the Soviets in C20th and it will defeat the coalition & US now. That is the real truth of the matter and anybody who says otherwise is in utter and totak denial Mr Bush !!!!!
Ian Payne, walsall,
Fair enough if the site was poorly chosen, however, we cant win this war with bombings alone we a greater troop presence from all the NATO members.
We also need to consider legalising the heroin trade for medicinal use only, lets face it - thats their economy, legislation and regulation I say.
Andre, London, UK