Doug McKinlay
Stories and Songs on today's free French CD, with The Times

The digital photography revolution continues to march on with what seems like an endless supply of new cameras and gizmos coming online weekly.
From high-end digital single lens reflex (DSLR) cameras that almost need a mortgage to buy, to small pocket-sized point and shoots that cost about the same as a packet of cigarettes, the choice has become staggering. But how does one make the right choice? The equation, in my opinion, is a combination of picture needs and budget.
If your photographic aspirations are to capture moments with friends and family while on holiday then a £6,000 camera is probably a little over the top. Conversely, if you aim to spend time on the Serengeti looking for the ultimate wildlife image you’ll need something with a little more guts than a £15 disposable.
Of course this sounds rather simplistic. Other factors need to be reckoned with when making a decision – number of megapixels, lens, durability etc. But the equation is a starting point on the path to making the right choice.
During the last year or two the major camera manufacturers – I’m mostly thinking of Canon, Nikon and Pentax – have been producing consumer priced DSLR’s. Cameras, for the most part, that are excellent and produce great results for their owners. Significantly, however, they have also been stepping up their game when it comes to compact cameras.
For me as a pro, and for people who can’t be bothered carrying all those lenses around, the holy grail of a point and shoot digital camera is one that can match, or at least come close to, the picture quality of DSLR’s.
In recent months, three camera makers – Leica, Samsung and Canon – have brought out models that come tantalisingly close, but do they make the grade?
Leica D-LUX 3
Like all Leica cameras the D-LUX 3 is a well-appointed, superbly built compact camera. There is nothing flash about this camera; it is all sleek black lines and understated styling. The high points are: 10 megapixels of image resolution, a large 2.8 inch LCD screen, a very sharp Leica DC Vario-Elmarit lens, image stabilisation, fully automatic or manual controls, a built in flash and it can capture images as either Jpeg or RAW files.
This was the first camera I tested of the three. And I was suitably impressed. The images produced were sharp with life-like colours, although at ISO 400 and above there was a little too much noise for my liking. However, this is a problem that most compact cameras have to deal with.
Although the D-LUX-3 can be used in full automatic, it really shines when its manual capabilities are on the job. Shutter and aperture priorities, along with full manual, give the photographer the right flexibility to produce some startling imagery. Accompanying this, Leica’s inclusion of RAW shooting means serious snappers can bypass all the camera’s inner workings, go right to the computer with their files and adjust them through the supplied Adobe Photoshop Elements software.
Overall I really liked this camera, however I have two complaints.
How the new breed of location based mobile services can find your nearest cashpoint, restaurant or wi-fi hotspot
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget


2006
£189,500
NW England
2008/08
£169,950
NW England
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool/Teeside
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Dining, Shopping & Riverside Pk
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
As with analogue cameras years ago, so with digital.
It's all in the lens!
Amateur camera users in the UK are constantly bamboozled with X pixels on that compared with Y pixels in this... More objective reviewing might rectify that. There can't be that many people who want or need to make huge prints.
Hugues, Evian, France
Be interested to see how these compare to the Sony T200. I've an ageing D-SLR (Olympus E10) but the Sony results are incredible - the auto exposure is better than the E10 outdoors. The Sony suffers in poorer light though and the image is never going to be as crisp as the lens on the E10.
Dan Cook, London, UK
I agree with Colm and NeilD about the Panasonic Lumix... i've had a Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX33 - which is basically a Leica C-Lux 2 with a different badge - for a month or so now. The Leica costs 419.99 with case, the Panasonic i got for 179.99 from Amazon.co.uk and the (Leica) case from an independent camera shop for 35.
I'm very happy with the Panasonic and think it's great value for money. and yes, the 3:2, 4:3 and 16:9 formats are really useful!
Marco, Kraków, Poland
People still buy cameras in the UK paying the ridiculous premium when it is so much cheaper (not to mention easy) to buy them from Asia via ebay?
Farrukh, Woking, UK
The number of pixels is a funny issue - in compact cameras it does matter, while in big SLRs it is less relevant. This is because they typically do not have a big zoom or viewfinder -- moreover, unlike professional photographers, amateurs lack access all area passes and rights to get to good positions for taking pictures, typically do not carry tripods, etc. -- the result is often a need to edit the picture, cropping it down and blowing up segments. Do that with a 5MP picture and picture quality suffers, as it also does if one tries to blow up the entire picture.
I am personally very fond of the Panasonic Lumix range, which have Leica optics and optical image stabilisation (they introduced it.) The best thing about the Lumix is that its CCD (picture chip) is in landscape format, i.e., wide in shape, which means that when a landscape picture is taken with it, it uses all the pixils -- other cameras automatically crop the top and bottom to achieve the same thing.
Colm MacKernan, London/Washington,
I am disappointed the reviewer did nothing to alleviate the public perception that the more megapixels the better; in fact he tended to support this erroneous myth.
With the sort of compact digital camera reviewed, the necessary, tiny, sensor chips employed suffer from noise problems in lower light and would benefit from less, not more, pixels, enabling the photo sites to be larger and thus more sensitive. Anything over 6-8 megapixels is totally unnecessary, especially for the average size of print resolution needed.
Ben, Zurich,
Isn't the Leica camera a souped-up version of a Panasonic Lumix, which is around 70 quid cheaper? Also, I think it has been available since mid-2006. I expect a newer version will be released eventually.
I think I'll go for the G9.
NeilD, Paris, France
I have to agree with Doug's view. I've not tried the other cameras he tested, but I've had the G9 for a few weeks now and am enjoying it more and more. I'm reassured that a demanding pro likes it too!
The optical viewfinder is of limited use due to parallax errors - it isn't giving you exactly the same view as the lens is getting. But it's there and it's useable - the 12.1 megapixels means the image is big enough to crop to something more like you intended.
But apart from that, this is a fantastic camera. Great pictures (esp RAW at lower ISO speeds). Great handling - the controls are easy to get at and encourage you to play around and take more control. Handles like a DSLR. Great feel and looks.
I also have a Canon DSLR, but find myself with the G9 more often - just easier to carry around and quick to set up to use.
More useable higher ISO would be useful (where the DSLR excells) but I don't know if it's possible on a sensor in the compact camera range.
Excellent camera.
phill, Hereford, UK