Matthew Parris
Win tickets to the ultimate village fete with welly wanging and more
This story is hugely reassuring. It proves that in a 21st-century world of virtual experiences, there’s still no substitute for going there. When my friends and I toured Colombia last year and found a country to which the Lonely Planet guide did not begin to do justice, we were perplexed. Unconvincing, unhelpful and thin, the guide seemed to have been dashed off in a hurry and missed the magic. It never occurred to us that at least one of the authors had not been there at all.
Lonely Planet was sketchy and vague where it should have been bursting with enthusiasm and information. The unbelievable Tierra Adentro country, for example, now safe for visitors - where stone manbird statues stand beneath dripping forest trees, our only link with a civilisation that has disappeared and of which almost nothing is known – was covered in a cursory way that gave no hint of the sense of mystery and revelation felt by any visitor. There was something half-hearted about this book – unaccountably smaller and inferior to the previous (1980s) edition, which our Colombian guide still kept with him.
The South American Handbook was not only more useful, but conveyed an authentic sense of the thrill of one of the world’s most beautiful, varied, spectacular and friendly countries. You cover a country properly or you do not do it at all. It is either safe enough for your readers to visit – and Colombia most emphatically is – or you should not be encouraging visitors at all.
But look on the bright side, fellow-enthusiasts for this little-visited country. An authentic account might have filled the place with tourists. By offering so flimsy an understatement of Colombia’s charms, Lonely Planet has helped to keep the secret – and done us all a favour.
Search our Travel Directory
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
I'm glad Colombia is not well-know around the world because it would damage it's magic. I have visited Colombia 3 times and I really want to go back. The people, the culture, the landscapes, everything is beautiful. I hope it never becomes as tourist asThailand o Peru. Colombia is the hidden pearl.
Nicolas Castellanos, Hyderabad, India
I agree with Richard. Given that the widespread (false) perception of Colombia is that it's too dangerous to visit, the LP clearly don't think there's much point is spending a lot of time and money on a guide for it.
South America is now flooded with English gap year tourists looking for kicks, but most have no interest in going to Colombia, so LP are simply following the market.
Although as a fellow lover of Colombia, I'm extremely glad that this is the case. Most of South America and Thailand have been ruined by English travellers trampling the culture and I'm glad that Colombia is currently avoiding the same damage.
Adam, Leeds,
it's all about cost cutting, Matthew. Even LP guides which were once well-written and informative - like the France or Provence books - are having the guts filleted out of them in order to make them cheaper to update (ie pay the writers even less) and cheaper to produce.
Richard Walker, London,
you were perplexed because of the guerrilla, thieves, kidnappers, or something similar?
Lucia Lopez, West palm Beach, USA/ FL
It would appear, also, that the writers of Lonely Planet, Sicily, have never visited the island. And if they have, it was ten years ago and they never left Catania.
Nor do they appear to have performed even the most rudimentary online fact checking regarding places to stay and places to eat, getting there, getting around, etc. And the 'cultural' blurbs are a very painful read.
I guess it IS a Lonely Planet when all you do is sit around cobbling together guides to places you have never visited...
zecchinetta, nyc, ny