David Aaronovitch
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday
Man must strive and striving he must err”, wrote Goethe. I have striven and I have erred. I now see it. Accept my apologies.
The moment of recognition came when, last Thursday, my local newspaper arrived carrying the following banner headline, “Switch to 4x4 saved my life, says motorist: call for trees to be axed before someone is killed.” A Mr Andrew Lipton had been driving down one of our many leafy streets, when a large maple fell on his car. There were two morals as far as the newspaper report was concerned. First that dangerous trees should be felled. The second was contained in the approving sentence, “Mr Lipton had recently swapped his BMW convertible for the 4x4 and says the much-maligned gas-guzzler probably saved his life.”
Something within me, as they say, died. The logic of this article seemed to be that we would all be safer if only we travelled everywhere in 4x4s. Clearly, schoolchildren, skipping the few yards to the neighbourhood school, and young mums on the Starbucks buggy patrol, are even less well protected from unexpected tree-fall than a man in a BMW convertible. They should all buy Porsche Cayenne Turbos.
Ordinarily and on its own, I would have had no problem dismissing this story. But my difficulty, and one that I acknowledge today, is that so much that is said and written and polled indicates that I am the one who is out on a limb. Well, me and Daniel Finkelstein, also of these pages. When he wrote recently suggesting - very reasonably, I thought - that we take a less punitive and childish attitude towards our MPs, his column managed the almost impossible feat of attracting unanimous hostility from online commenters. To a person they excoriated our representatives as lazy, lying, swindling scumbags, and their defenders as apologists for a decadent elite.
“Is it me?” I thought. Or them? Am I really part of a metropolitan class that has lost touch with the realities of everyday life? Is their perception more valid, in many ways, than what I like to think is my truth? Here, in my shoes, stands the Hampstead columnist thinking that Britain is not in terminal crisis, but over there, in yesterday's comment box, is an articulate woman explaining support for the BNP in terms of how “a lot of little things add up” to rage. In Wellingborough, she explains, one in four of the homes in her road is now occupied by Eastern Europeans, Polish shops are opening up, in local supermarkets people speak to each other in Slav languages. And instead of feeling all sympathetic to her, my instant response is: “Yes, and what's the problem? We take over whole areas of the Spanish Costa, but we don't expect the locals to revive Franco and go marching around Benalmadena yelling 'Arriba Espana!'.”
But if Daniel's defence of the MPs was unpopular, Martin Samuels's piece last week on what we might call white-collar insurgency, was the most appreciated article of the season. You may remember that Martin effortlessly gathered up separate discontents, moulded them into one thunderbolt, and hurled it at the powers that be. The excessive cost of a Starbucks coffee, a friend being fined for failing to pay the congestion charge, the addition of administration charges to a credit card bill for match tickets: all these together represented the ripping off and bullying of ordinary Britons by the new exploiters, a class of extraordinary plasticity. Again the comments overwhelmingly endorsed Martin's view. Every synonym for “fury” was to be found in there, somewhere.
“There are more things in Heav'n and Earth,” Hamlet chided Horatio, “than are dreamt of in your philosophy.” Had I become Horatio, so blinded by rational argument that I failed to spot a perfectly serviceable Ghost when one appeared? When Martin argued that the past 12 years of economic growth have been a sham, and that what is true is people's perception of their circumstances, wasn't it pedantic to say, “Well, no, real disposable incomes have risen for all sections of society”? If people think they're poorer, then they're poorer, aren't they? If they think that crime is rising, and they're afraid of it, what good does it do to argue that, in fact, crime levels are stable or falling?
Perhaps this is what the junior minister, Ivan Lewis, meant at the weekend when he appeared to chide his own Government for being out of touch with the concerns of “ordinary, hard-working people” on issues such as (nudge to the Right) immigration and (nudge to the Left) taxing the fat cats. I previously might have responded that tacking to the winds of prejudice would do nothing to make us richer or safer, but now I realise that I was wrong. Perception is reality and sometimes the most real thing about us is our sense of grievance.
The wise politician and the canny columnist understand this. They don't remind the whinger that he's richer than ever before, the hypochondriac that she's living longer than ever, the misanthropes that they've never taken more or longer holidays, the cabbie that he's never had it (or us) so good, the xenophobe that immigrants take the jobs that we often won't, the indebted that they were the ones who took out the loans, or the livid motorist that the problem is how to ration scarce driving and parking space in a world where everyone wants a car.
Of course, this has implications for policy. “Parking spaces are getting smaller,” a Susan Curhan told The Seattle Times recently. She'd just had a hard job parking her large 4x4 in a small space next to another large 4x4 at a shopping mall “It's crazy,” she went on. In fact the spaces were the same size as they'd ever been, and in my old incarnation I suppose I'd have told her to change her vehicle. But now I see this as a doomed exercise. Better just to increase the sizes of the parking spaces.
So, in my previous world, the one I inhabited up until March 31, I could have sneered at the local newspaper. I might have pointed out that, in terms of risk, 191 people were killed or seriously injured in my borough in road traffic accidents in 2003, most of them pedestrians or cyclists - compared with an annual average of three people killed in the whole of Great Britain by falling trees. Naturally I might have added that gas guzzlers tend to pollute the planet, while maples, elms, beech and other silent killers, act in the opposite way.
But this is April 1, and on All Fools' Day I am forced to admit that whereas before I thought we needed trees to save us from 4x4s, now I realise we need 4x4s to save us from the trees.

David Aaronovitch is a writer, broadcaster and commentator on international politics and the media. He writes for The Times Comment page on Tuesdays. He has previously written for The Guardian, The Observer and The Independent, winning numerous accolades, including Columnist of the Year 2003 and the 2001 Orwell prize for journalism. He has appeared on the satirical TV current affairs programme Have I Got News For You and made radio broadcasts on historical topics
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Every grievance is pandered too - even the BBC have "nationalised social panics".
David N icholls, Dalbeattie, UK
But my convertible allows me to appreciate the trees as I drive past! I must not over do it, though--lest I drive into one, it falls over, and proves fatal because I wasn't driving an SUV.
J Michael AJP Llamas, New York/London,
as any car with a roof would offer better protection, I took the caution in mr lipton's tale to be against driving bmw convertibles.
I can't help (sorry) mentioning to ian (sheffield) that a 4x4 is no more likely to tip over than any other car. unless, of course, you drive like a maniac, not to mention that there are several conditions the average driver is more likely to encounter in which a 4x4 would be the safest option. maybe even the greenest.
also, speaking as a conscientious vegetarian, avid recycler (from the days when you had to be proactive, rather than compelled by your council) and keen cyclist.... I have a 4.3 litre suv. it has nothing to do with low self-esteem (on the contrary, I rather love myself), but rather because it is the most sensible option when I take a number of relevant considerations into account.
should anyone be inclined to make ignorant assumptions about my selfish nature and love for the planet, he will get short shrift.
jem, london, uk
As I walked under a tree in the park today, and it did not threaten me at all, just waved a cheery hello with its new green leaves.
Peter, London,
attaboy! The real trouble is that Hampstead has just got too small: they should bulldoze Heath Street, not to mention New End and Flask Walk - and complete the A1/M1 link too!
[Only joking}
David Wilson, London,
Happy April Fool's Day!
Sam, Oxford, UK
Brilliant article, David. You had me fooled until the "April Fool" at the end. The torrent of idiocy supporting Martin Samuel's contention that the last 11 years of economic growth was a mirage, and that Brown was to blame for the price of a coffee in Starbucks had me worried, and when you seemed to be caving in to the mob I was in despair. Then at the end you rekindled the hope that reason and sanity will prevail in the end.
Wilf, London,
Yes, David, you really, really are out of touch. You are as out of touch, in a different way, as the Minister who thinks she needs a stab vest to walk around in Peckham. Perhaps you are right and everybody else is wrong, but I think you should get around more before making that judgement.
Frank Upton, Solihull,
Peterj,
A BMW 5-series isn't a 4x4 though, is it?
A Porsche Cayenne gets between 13 and 20 mpg, depending on where/how it's driven, while the BMW X-5 (their 4x4) gets somewhere between 17 and 25. While the 5-series diesel does get a highly commendable 50.1 mpg on average, the Prius is only a couple behind at 48--still way better than any genuine 4x4.
The argument against designer water and gas-guzzling cars is that there are relatively painless alternatives--vehicles that achieve better mpg ratings, and tap water. Thus, we can do the same things with less cost to the environment, rather than advocating outright prohibition, as you do with alcohol.
No-one is suggesting stopping drinking water or driving outright, so a knee-jerk reaction like banning alcohol smacks of an attempt to cover one societal ill by fatuously drawing attention to another. Why not ban the production and distribution of books while we're at it?
Phil Stott, New York, via Dundee
David, this the first occasion on which I have agreed with anything that you have written.
Why then do you continue to believe in the theory of anthropogenic warming when there is not a shred of evidence to support it?
Perhaps because you have adopted the flawed logic of the lady in Seattle that it must be burning of fossil fuel despite the fact those previous periods of warming over the Earth occurred before man was burning large amounts of C02 or burning C02 at all.
Stan Coveney, London,
There is no denying that SUVs/4x4s are fundamentally selfish. As well as guzzling gas, they take up more road space, restrict car drivers' visibility (at roundabouts and junctions I have to pull into traffic before I can see round the SUV on my right), they are much more likely to kill pedestrians and other car drives all the while offering only illusory safety to the SUV driver. They are less stable than cars and much more likely to tip over. They have the aerodynamics of a brick. SUV drivers take up 1 1/2 parkig spaces because they can't fit into a single space.
I feel sorry for anyone who has such low self esteem that they need to drive a 3 ton behemoth.
But people can't help being selfish. It's just the way they are. They will put their fingers in their ears and close their minds to any facts they dont like: Climate change is a myth; people who complain about them are envious (funny how I'm not envious of cars and motorbikes and could have bought one but think of others)
Ian, Sheffield, UK
Yes. Some odd things are going on. Trouser waistbands are definitely getting smaller, but the petrol tank on my car seems to get bigger every time I fill it up.
Anthony Price, Truro,
For the last 60 years we have been run by accountants, economists, and conmen. Some reminders.
The USA is so rich in natural resources they could pay someone else and still have a better standard than most. The 1929 crash was caused by the above.
Japan has no natural resources. The country was so overdeveloped in 60/70s there is no space for further hence stagnation.
Britain had the right resources at the right time to insitgate the industrial revolution, but whilst 80% of world cotton exports came from Lancashire. 80% of the chemicals came from Switzerland, and Germany.
Some countries are so fragile one person per square mile is overcrowding. the same applies to a tiny island now with the wrong resources, and lacking basic skills.
Hence continuing friction between those in La La land and those struggling .
ged, manchester,
If everyone gets a 4x4 then there is no individual impact safety advantage; therefore neurotic, selfish and stupid people would want hummers, armoured cars, tanks.
I R Baboon, Northampton, UK
Many people fear the worse,disaster is always around the corner.When it never happens it makes them feel better --- until the next storm is about to break. Read the article on page 28. Thats how they live and survive and I admit in some ways I do to.Let them have their say -- most of the time they don't mean it.Its human nature. Nothing to worry about. Life moves on and society slowly gets better and safer.
Robert, Milton Keynes, England
David,
Just popped over for a gander from me normal stomping ground of GuardianUnlimited...Class.
Larry, Coventry,
Lying in bed this morning, listening to someone on the Today programme pulling immigration to pieces, got up feeling slightly depressed. Over a coffee and half way through your article my gloom deepened. By chance the TV was on and with half an ear heard a man completely destroy the report on immigration, my spirits began to soar. When I got to the end of your article I laughed out loud. Back on track! Always a good read.
G Hallett, Bradford, West Yorkshire
Good article, as usual. It makes me so angry how angry everyone else is and it was heartening to read a piece which copes with the contradiction in getting into a rage at other peoples' fury.
By the way, the Danny Finkelstein piece was excellent, but no-one could have expected support from the slavering trolls who responded, infesting our political culture, battening onto the opinions of others to pollute the air with their.........
H'mmm. will sign off now, hoping to recover soon.
David Stanley, Harrow, Miidx
the porsche cayenne turbo ????
' if i wanted a tonka toy terry i would have asked for one' (arthur daly)
and it still holds good today
david c, purbeck,
Hm... a clear case of "my ideas are based on even-handed assessment, reason and logic; yours on prejudice".
There's an easy test for prejudiced thinking: conclusions will always point in the same direction. After a while you can tell what someone will say on almost any topic before they've said it. The conclusion of course comes first, the reason and logic serve merely to justify it. The test works on anyone - all the way from Dianne Abbott to Jeremy Clarkson. It probably even works on me.
Ken Leyland, Liverpool, U.K.
Now you've done it. You've said that most accident victims in your borough were pedestrians or cyclists.
Expect a tsunami of rage from outraged cyclists. How dare you suggest, ever so obliquely, that cycling is dangerous! If it weren't for all those 4x4s then there wouldn't be any road deaths, etc.
Christopher Chantrill, Seattle, USA
Sorry, but parking spaces - and streets - are definitely shrinking. On holiday in England last year I rented a mid-range car and discovered it would barely fit into the road I used to live in.
Since I recall driving up and down that road in my old mini without any trouble, it seems pretty obvious to me that either the council have sneakily been expanding the pavements, or that England is in fact shrinking. Since the council never in living memory spent anything on pavements, it must be the latter.
Clive, Monterrey , Mexico
it is popular to criticize ownership of 4x4 but what about the environmental vandalism associated with consuming alcohol. Apart from the obvious problem of antisocial behaviour just consider the energy wasted in manufacturing and distributing huge volumes of alcohol. The containers needed to temporarily store it. The fuel used transporting it and the resources used to process the "residue"! Forget about designer water and 4x4's it's time we recognized the 80/20 rule. Besides which some 4x4's are more economical than small cars. It is the average rpm of the engine that generally determines it's efficiency. ...and to overturn a populist myth, a diesel BMW 5 Series is less poluting and more economical than a hybrid Toyota Prius! It's all about envy not environmental impact.
peterj, aberdeen, uk
April Fool's day or not, David Aaronovitch lost touch with ordinary reality and people a long time ago; the advocate of the elitist separatism of political correctness that he is. He has plenty of company, of course, in that most of the establishment are fellow PC fascists. All deserve our firm contempt.
Steve Moxon, Sheffield,
April 1st. Columnist says he can see the trees but denies the existence of the wood
Avana Beach, London, UK