Ben Webster, Transport Correspondent
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday
The Spanish company that owns Heathrow yesterday threatened to abandon a £1.5 billion plan to upgrade the airport in time for the 2012 London Olympics.
Ferrovial said that the Civil Aviation Authority, which sets the landing charges at Britain’s biggest airports, was giving it too little incentive to invest in replacing Terminals 1 and 2.
Rafael del Pino, Ferrovial’s chairman, admitted that conditions for passengers at Heathrow were already unacceptable, with long queues at security and outdated facilities.
He said: “We are aware that there are many deficiencies. The infrastructure is old and dirty. Some of the assets do not work. We have planning permission to transform Heathrow but the CAA has got to give us the incentive to do that.”
Mr del Pino said Britain needed to decide whether it was willing to pay for a world-class airport. “There is a big question over whether you want a good airport or a cheap airport. At the moment the regulatory regime has been very good at making airports cheap but has not been very successful at getting world-class airports. Heathrow is losing traffic to other hubs that charge more than Heathrow is charging.”
He said most passengers, if asked when queuing at security, would be willing to pay an extra £3 to get through to the departure lounge in only three minutes.
Ferrovial bought BAA, the airport company that owns Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted, Southampton, Glasgow, Edinburgh and Aberdeen airports, last August for £10 billion. Mr del Pino said Ferrovial was being unfairly blamed for 20 years of “chronic under investment”.
Mr del Pino, whose family owns more than 55 per cent of Ferrovial, said plans to replace Terminals 1 and 2 with a modern terminal would only proceed if the CAA allowed the company a greater return on its investment.
The first stage of the development is due to be completed by March 2012, just in time for the Olympics. But Mr del Pino said that deadline could be achieved only if the CAA gave a more generous settlement by the end of this year.
Asked if the chaotic scenes at Heathrow last summer would be repeated this year, he said: “I hope not but there is always potential.”
Terminal 5 is due to open at Heathrow in next March but that will only cater for 40 per cent of the airport’s passengers.
The Competition Commission is currently considering the CAA’s proposed charging regime for BAA and is due to report in September.
Mr del Pino said Heathrow was already handling almost twice as many passengers as it was designed for. “It was designed for about 45 million passengers and now we have almost 70 million.”
He said Heathrow was losing passengers to other European hubs because of Britain’s unique security rule that passengers can take only one piece of hand luggage on to aircraft.
The Department for Transport is allowing Heathrow to carry out a trial from next month in which passengers changing flights at the airport will be allowed two pieces of hand luggage.
Since the extra security controls were imposed last August BAA has recruited 1,400 more security guards for its seven British airports, including 500 at Heathrow.
Stephen Nelson, BAA chief executive, said it would carry on recruiting until it achieved its target of getting 95 per cent of passengers through in less than five minutes. He admitted that BAA would have to pay penalties for failing to achieve its queuing time targets.
Mr Nelson said: “We will continue to recruit until we have the right complement of people for the peak.”
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Overseas contacts and local business information

Find a course, arrange a game and save money
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Corporate greed now holding those who need to use Heathrow to ransom. This is the price we pay for allowing a vital piece of transport infrastructure to be sold off.
Geoffrey, Belfast,
Our airports are one of the cornerstones of our economy. It is incredible that an island off the coast of Europe has the worldâs busiest International Airport in the form of Heathrow. Now that we have achieved this status we put Johnnie Foreigner in charge to show us how things should be done. Is that wise Captain Mainwaring?
David Elliott, Brighton, UK
Ferrovials' demand sounds like blackmail. Essential infrastructure like airports and water supply should be held in public trust companies and not by monopolists. The initial transfer of the airports to BAA was a success, but now a different form of capitalism has bought them, and passengers will, unacceptably, be used as pawns to secure maximum profit.
carter, london, uk
June 2007 - I will never fly through Heathrow again, full stop. I will go to Glasgow and Gatwick perhaps or Stansted but never Heathrow. Why? For all the reasons that have been talked about for years but presently are at a crisus condition.
John Skeaff, Toronto, Canada
Heathrow as an enty port to UK is a digarce. This is a battle of hearts, minds and customer choice. If business decisions are alowed to over-ride common sense, we are left with a shambolic entry point to a country that wants tourist dollars.
Why choose to fly to H/R? Come on CAA and BAA get your act together, the idea that your airport is good is a mockery.
Mark Cowley, Melbourne, Australia
So Ferrovial pays 10 billion for BAA, presumably because it is very profitable, then holds the Govenment to ransom, using the Olympics, in order to squeeze money out of them. This sound as though the same regime is continuing, where the new owner will take the profit and only make improvements if we pay extra for it. To suggest paying 3 pounds for something which should be the most basic airport service should vcertainly be considered ground for breaking up the BAA monopoly, as has been suggested.
Bill Atkins, Rehoboth Beach, USA
I hope the DTI are reading this. There can't be a clear sign of market abuse than this - holding passengers to ransom in the knowledge that they can't go anywhere else.
David, London,
I use Heathrow and Gatwick alot. They are really quite bad any standards. They knew what they had bought so it is up to them to upgrade the airports.
If they do not want to pay why not nationalise them with no compensation to the Spanish.
Brian Laming, Winchester,
"plans to replace Terminals 1 and 2 with a modern terminal would only proceed if the CAA allowed the company a greater return on its investment" - absolute GREED!!!
Heathrow is already losing out to nearby airports on the mainland Europe like Amsterdam, improve the facilities at Heathrow and more people will use it which means more money in the pockets of Heathrow's owners.
Bart, London, UK,
It's embarrassing that one of the world's wealthiest nations has such a third-rate airport. Britain suffers for its obsession with private, property-driven wealth over investment in public infrastructure once again.
peter, London, UK
Ferrovial knew the score when the bought BAA, now they want more. I am already by-passing Heathrow People do not want to pay more for what they are now getting
Mike, Paphos, Cyprus
The UK is the most open economy in Europe. Spanish companies have bought Abbey National, O2, Scottish Power & BAA in a free market where the shareholders decide whether to sell or not with no interference from the government unlike in Spain as recent events have shown. Senor Rafael del Pino the Chairman of Ferrovial knew the rules when he bought the monoply BAA using a high level of debt. One would assume that he did Due Diligence found the apparent chronic underinvestment & priced his bid accordingly. The CAA should take a hard line & force them to invest. If not they can always sell the monopoly at market price.
C McFarlane, Buenos Aires, Argentina